Why are you posting to me about Obama?
You can say anything you want.
I don’t know why it’s relevant to the discussion here.
I agree that his mother didn’t fit the statutory requirements of age and residency.
My last post here was dealing with the fact that another poster was claiming that any statute that specified # of years residing in America, and age, for one parent to produce a NBC offspring born beyond America’s border, was going too far and was itself an unconstitutional statute for that reason.
In that context I don’t get your posting to me that you believe Obama’s status doesn’t fit that statute.
I agree with you on that.
His mom was too young to fit into that statutory requirement.
So?
I was answering someone who was trying to argue that all such requirement-specifying statutes went beyond Constitutional authority in defining NBC.
And my point in reply was that there is no adjudicated authority establishing that person’s belief as “the law”.
It’s just a belief stated on the internet website Free Republic.
Whether Obama was born in Kenya or Hawaii or Timbuktu, IF either one of his parents had fit the statutory requirements that define NBC, he would still be an eligible. His father as you say was never a citizen. His mother did not fall under the age and residency requirement of the statute, she was a little bit too young. But the Kenya part would not decide it, according to the statute. The parental status would decide it.
Again, I was discussing an issue brought up by someone who was arguing that the statute itself went too far in specifying age and resident requirements for one parent to produce a NBC offspring that was born in another country, therefore was not a constitutional statute.
And my reply was, that has not been established under our system and is reduced to something you believe and posted here.