Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: webstersII
"You put Charles Stanley up as a good example?"

"He belongs in the other camp."

I don't know what you mean by "the other camp." If you are saying he's a liberal, I disagree. I've listened to him 15 or 20 times, and he never struck me as a liberal. All I meant was that he seems sincere - he's not constantly talking about money, he's not proclaiming spurious healing powers, he's not spouting dubious "prophecy," he's not preaching the "prosperity Gospel," and his message seems very much within the bounds of traditional Protestant orthodoxy. (I am not a Protestant, so mine is an outsider's perspective.)
12 posted on 08/30/2013 10:51:36 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle

He doesn’t preach prosperity, as you said, but he is quite wealthy just as all the others are.

Plus he said he would step down from the pulpit if he ever got divorced (he has always refused to marry divorced people and said divorced people should not preach) but he didn’t step down after he got divorced.

Just another preacher with a huge following. The rules seem to be different for them.


13 posted on 08/30/2013 11:28:06 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Steve_Seattle
Charles Stanley is not a phoney. He is one of the few televangelists that I trust.
14 posted on 08/30/2013 11:33:35 AM PDT by mrvirgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson