I remember the Bush administration quoting intelligence sources from other countries, too, under the theory that if they are also saying it, it must be true.
Some things, they never change. Now, we are to believe that this is true because more than one ally in the argument has said similar things, quoting yet other allies (Israel).
I’m sorry, none of this is proof of anything. It is restated rumor and innuendo.
If it is so clearly done and done by Assad, why can we not see the proof for ourselves?
This is nothing but a pretext to drag us into war and to get us to support people we have no business supporting.
The burden of proof for Obama, as for Bush, was on the administration to justify their claims with evidence.
Then, the question is, “So what if Chemicals were used? What makes it necessary for us to intervene when chemicals are used?”
Why is that a given?
Can't leave Obama red faced over his "red line" campaign statement.