To: dinoparty
I didn’t say that. What I meant is the first sentence says syrian officials were discussing the chemical attack. It didn’t say they did it. If it was KNOWN that WE did it Syrian officials would still be discussing it.
11 posted on
08/26/2013 3:34:44 PM PDT by
VerySadAmerican
(When you vote for evil because you can't see evil, you ARE evil.)
To: VerySadAmerican
I know that is what you said. But the reporter would need to be incredibly dense to not realize that this would be taken as an implication that the government guys were responsible for the attack.
To: VerySadAmerican
What would Assad gain by killing 100 civilians with chemical weapons? It's ridiculous. The al quada terrorist are the ones who benefit from the chemical weapons attack on civilians. The recording of some people talking on open lines means absolutely nothing. This is a false flag attack To get America to save Al quadas ass. Assad has been beating them back for a while now.
21 posted on
08/26/2013 5:11:28 PM PDT by
peeps36
(I'm Not A Racist, I Hate Douchebags f All Colors)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson