State courts have no jurisdiction over nationality law.
Furthermore, NONE of the federal court rulings you cited ever asserted that U.S. Secretary of State Bayard’s citizenship determination that U.S.-born Richard Greisser wasn’t a born citizen was incorrect.
And, in fact, most of those federal rulings are specifically based on FALSE assumptions. For example, the Tisdale v. Obama ruling states: “It is well settled that those born within the United States are natural born citizens,” but I have already quoted a U.S. Secretary of State citizenship determination that states specifically otherwise: a man born in the U.S. to an alien father was not only NOT a natural born citizen, he wasn’t even born a U.S. citizen at all. That’s a FACT. It’s a matter of actual historic record.
Well settled, my assssss. [rolleyes]
How many of you are truly duped by that windbag BS? Why do you fall for it so easily?
Do you really think that the policy determination of a Secretary of State trumps a federal court ruling? Each presidential administration and each Secretary of State can make a different determination.
Furthermore, if plaintiffs in state or federal eligibility lawsuits did not cite Secretary of State Thomas Bayard’s determination, judges are under no obligation to rule on its relevance.