Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: djf
If we rely on “political correctness” or an “evolving Constitution” then we are no better than the other side.

The problem with that assumption, is that the Constitution is already clear as to your understanding that "Natural Born" means 2 parents of US Citizenship.

It is not clear.

So this is not about an "evolving Constitution" but about actually establishing the constitutional meaning of the phrase "Natural Born" since no one has been able to point out the complete, concise definition from the Constitution, US Law, or Supreme Court ruling as of yet here on FreeRepublic.
272 posted on 08/27/2013 10:30:20 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie; djf
The problem with that assumption, is that the Constitution is already clear as to your understanding that "Natural Born" means 2 parents of US Citizenship.

Should have been:

The problem is with your assumption, that the Constitution is already clear and aligns with your understanding that "Natural Born" means 2 parents of US Citizenship.
274 posted on 08/27/2013 10:32:51 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson