[SoConPubbie]

NO You are wrong again.... The founders knew exactly what they meant when they authored it. They all agreed. Like I said, they debated every single word untill they agreed. I understand what they meant. It is very clear to me. BUT you think they intentionally made the meaning ambiguous? Jeesh

Prove it.

I have as yet to see any historical documents/references that clearly state that they were all in agreement as to the meaning of "Natural Born".

So far, it has all been oblique references. Put the debate to rest with something that conclusively proves, as you state, they were all in agreeance with your opinion of what is "Natural Born". Not some type of inference, or something that requires the reader to connect the dots, but something definitive.

[Constitution 123]

"""Prove it"""

People will read what you posted and what I posted and decide who is correct. As far as I am concerned, I already proved my point. I think the meaning of article 2 section 1 clause 5 is very clear..... you think it is intentionally ambiguous. Maybe one day the supreme court will rule. Until then, I will advocate for what I believe. I am done with you.... Have a nice evening.