Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hugh the Scot
"""""The only way the supremes will hear this case is if someone with “standing” sues. Romney didn’t, McLame didn’t. Hillary might."""""

Standing, in my opinion is an abused legal term used by some courts to avoid judicial action. As far as the Supreme court is concerned, standing has not been the reason cases were turned away without comment.

As far as I am concerned, whenever a there is an issue regarding a fundamental constitutional issue like eligibility, all citizens have standing

155 posted on 08/26/2013 5:49:33 PM PDT by Constitution 123 (someintrest from the legeslature, perhaps then they will heal some appeals brought them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: Constitution 123

I won’t argue your opinion. You’re entitled to that. I do however, differ on the question of whether the SCrOTUS has rejected birther cases based on standing.


158 posted on 08/26/2013 5:54:29 PM PDT by Hugh the Scot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson