To: SoConPubbie
"""""your position boils down, in all honesty, that you would have us believe that your opinion is settled"""""
You misstate my position..... Even though I believe that the framers all new what they meant when they used both terms Citizen and natural born citizen in the came clause, because there are those like you who disagree, by definition it is not settled.
To clarify my position, I believe that it is time for the Supreme Court to stop rejecting cases placed before them and make a ruling that includes a clear definition of NBC. We need to document the intent of the framers..... This why our government was established with co-equal branches including checks and balances.
137 posted on
08/26/2013 4:56:53 PM PDT by
Constitution 123
(someintrest from the legeslature, perhaps then they will heal some appeals brought them.)
To: Constitution 123
What a horrible idea. The only way the supremes will hear this case is if someone with “standing” sues. Romney didn’t, McLame didn’t. Hillary might.
To: Constitution 123
To clarify my position, I believe that it is time for the Supreme Court to stop rejecting cases placed before them and make a ruling that includes a clear definition of NBC. We need to document the intent of the framers..... This why our government was established with co-equal branches including checks and balances.
On this we agree.
170 posted on
08/26/2013 6:18:37 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson