To: DiogenesLamp
Not me. I regard Ron Paul as a complete nut. Wouldn't want him anywhere near the reigns of power. His son "Rand", is better, but still leaves me feeling a bit uneasy that he shares some of his father's Kookiness but manages to hide it.
I should have been more clear in that post.
What I meant, was those freepers who think that "Natural Law" means both parents have to be citizens at the time of birth.
English is prone to misunderstandings, vagueness, and wrong perceptions.
Mastering English, even for the "Natural Born" citizen, seems to be a life-time affair.
101 posted on
08/26/2013 1:56:07 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
What I meant, was those freepers who think that "Natural Law" means both parents have to be citizens at the time of birth. I should have been more clear in that post.
I guess I didn't make myself clear either. *I* am one such of which you speak.
Split citizenship is NOT natural. It didn't exist prior to 1922, and was only created as a side-effect of the Cable act. Prior to 1922, Women were automatically naturalized to be the same citizenship as their husbands. Children of married parents were ALWAYS born to parents of the same nationality.
103 posted on
08/26/2013 2:01:05 PM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
(Partus Sequitur Patrem)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson