Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MinuteGal

I doubt that, since I’m older than dirt. And you attacked me first in a snarky manner, saying the lease didn’t say this and that when you later admitted that you had not read the lease either.

Again, it depends on the terms of the lease, which neither you, nor I, know, but which I freely admitted with the phrase “it depends on the terms”. Many leases require the tenant to do all repairs and paint on their own dime.

The point you are missing is that this is POLITICAL speech, and that is protected by the 1st Amendment. If the building owner did not want such a sign, she should have had a clause prohibiting it. That’s what lawyers are for.


47 posted on 08/17/2013 3:08:47 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: afraidfortherepublic
The point you are missing is that this is POLITICAL speech, and that is protected by the 1st Amendment. If the building owner did not want such a sign, she should have had a clause prohibiting it. That’s what lawyers are for.

No, the point being missed is that the First Amendment only applies to congress.

49 posted on 08/17/2013 4:02:47 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson