Because the federal government would never allow a city or state to provide sanctuary to a protected class...right?
"I'm not really sure why you picked this particular case since it has nothing to do with secession."
I didn't. Kentucky v. Dennison is listed in constitutional law texts under chapters dealing with secession. See post #157. I find it quite telling that Texas v. White is barely mentioned.
But they didn't.
I didn't. Kentucky v. Dennison is listed in constitutional law texts under chapters dealing with secession. See post #157. I find it quite telling that Texas v. White is barely mentioned.
It doesn't surprise me depending on the slant of the website. But maybe you should read the Dennison decision? Link