Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 0.E.O

You asked for an opinion, not an answer.
No, it would not be a constitutional remedy.


178 posted on 08/19/2013 10:32:29 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: moehoward
No, it would not be a constitutional remedy.

But it was the remedy that the South chose in 1861. They left with out discussion, walked away from debt obligations, and took everthing they could get their hands on. If their solution was unconstitutional then how could Lincoln be accused of violating the 10th Amendment by opposing it?

179 posted on 08/19/2013 10:35:50 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson