Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson
Analysts say the consumer cost caps on out-of-pocket expenses will necessarily mean skyrocketing healthcare costs for Americans, as high costs for sicker citizens are shifted to healthier Americans who pay less for health insurance.

That is Obamacare in a nutshell.

7 posted on 08/15/2013 12:53:32 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fortheDeclaration; All

The purpose of the US Federal Government involving itself in the US Medical Profession is to control and take the money that people will spend on their own personal medical issues.

Basically, the US Medical Profession is viewed as a cash-cow for the US Federal Welfare State, which currently is totally supported by selling US Debt Bonds to strangers, and thus generates 40 % of the annual debt of the Total US Federal Government.

Commie Obama easily manipulates the Republicans into the trap of “come up with your own plan, if you don’t like mine” public debt to Nationalize a cash-cow from the Medical Profession.

Which “Conservative” Republican has chastised the Republican Party or Obama for decimating the Medical Profession in order to support the bottomless money pit of the US Federal Welfare State?

Are the Republicans fearful of being voted out of office if they advocated switching from “repeal and replace” to “Repeal and ABOLISH!” ?

2012 voters chose NOT to “replace Obama’care’ with Romneycare, so why have the Republicans held onto the “replace” policy if not to try to keep the US Federal Welfare State in control of our lives?

Do “Conservative” Republicans show that they are just supporters of unlimited Public Debt to support the failed philosophy of the US Federal Welfare State?

Which Republican will be the first to propose that the US Federal Government’s main financial problem is due to Federal involvement in Medicare, Medicaid, and Obama’care?’

Which Republican will tell House Leadership to stop promoting Federal involvement in the US Medical Profession by trying to replace instead of abolish?

Are “Conservative” Republicans just trying to Conserve Federal involvement and control of the US Medical Profession by offering token opposition to Obama’care?’

Politician name recognition and “favorites” aside, if we are to accurately choose leaders who will lead us back onto the right track, we MUST be brutally honest about the probable effects of the ideas from these leaders.

We need to call ‘em as we see ‘em, and from what I see, Republicans are not Conservatives if they timidly and ineffectively oppose Nationization of the US Medical Profession.

What say all of you?


38 posted on 08/15/2013 2:02:39 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson