. . to faithfully execute the laws . . .
I believe their argument would be that he (or anyone serving as president)would be in violation of their oath (or affirmation) with regards to the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution.
Just stand by everyone - the SC just may get behind Obama on this - after the Obamacare ruling, would anyone be surprised? Didn't he already grant amnesty to 150,000 illegals before the 2012 election? - with nary a peep from the gelded republican ruling class in DC.
“Faithfully execute the laws” != “Ensure there are no second-class citizens.” That’s twisting the document. Roberts’ Obastardcare ruling showed me the government will twist any clause in the Constitution to fit the desired outcome. DC is lawless.
It hasn’t mattered what’s in the Constitution for some time, and if we don’t get back to it we’re doomed as a Nation.