Anders Behring Breivik can be called many things, but a madman is not one of them. He had a very well thought out plan to cripple the next generation of socialist leaders, to save his country, and the plan worked, though murderous.
Norway has a very small population, of only 4.7 million. And it was, and remains, an effort of the socialists to dilute the Norwegian population with unrestricted immigration, which would eventually wipe out Norway as a state, a culture, a history, and a people.
Norway would become just a socialist district in the EU, no longer a nation. A generic place. A gray place. And all that Norway had been before would be lost.
To achieve this, the socialist and communist youth movements merged just five years after the German Hitler Youth were created, and created a socialist and communist version of the Jugend. Their purposes were the same, to create an ideologically pure next generation of leaders, to guarantee the future of Nazi Germany or socialist/communist Norway.
And this effort is not unique to Norway. The Socialist International is an organization of left wing political parties from around the world, and they are devoted to doing to their nations what the Norwegian socialists intended to do to theirs.
So imagine, for a moment, if Anders Behring Breivik had lived in 1942 Germany, and decided to slaughter an equal number of German Hitler Youths, in defense of occupied Norway. Would he have still been seen as a villain?
I suppose the difference is that the Nazis just wanted to rule the nation of Norway. The socialists just wanted to destroy it entirely.
Well, yeah, because the Hitler Youth were absolutely victims of nazism. Now, if he'd taken out an SS command post (or the leadership most responsible for perverting the kids) that would be one thing, but to shoot 70 unarmed kids is something else entirely.
I did not know that it was a labor party camp - I had heard that he did not like the islamic immigration into his country and I was baffled by how he thought shooting up a summer camp would somehow stop the situation. I just assumed insane people do insane things and little would be learned by reading anything he wrote; so, thank you for your explanation.