Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 5thGenTexan
Louis XIV


24 posted on 08/08/2013 8:41:57 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Colonel Kangaroo

Good point.


44 posted on 08/08/2013 8:51:10 AM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo; All

85 posted on 08/08/2013 9:19:52 AM PDT by Zakeet (Democrats: Making everything free in this country except you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
He took the comforter with him when he got out of bed.


93 posted on 08/08/2013 9:24:25 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (People are idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Ah, but that was back in the day, centuries before women wore high heels when womanly dress involved not showing legs, and men wore high heels to make their legs more symmetric and alluring to women, rather than the other way around.

Personally, I think reviving some older elements of manly fashion (*not* high heels) like cloaks, capes, morning coats, waistcoats, and maybe hose and doublet wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing. Of course, it would make it easier to be a fop than it is when acceptable men’s clothing (formal evening wear aside) ranges from jeans and a t-shirt to a three-piece suit with tie and French-cuffed shirt.


98 posted on 08/08/2013 9:37:31 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson