The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
The anti-gun states are also going to lose a lot of their tax-base, also, as pro-gun members of the population leave.
And we should apply pressure on those manufacturers (of any type) who choose to remain in such socially backward states (Connecticut, Maryland, New York and Colorado). Libs are to be despised, isolated, and f*rted in the general direction of.
The guillotine comes later.
Its a tough call: If all the gun manufacturers leave anti-gun’ states, then those state legislators don’t even need to take into account the impact on jobs and the economy, when they pass even more laws. I do think that in some cases, some gun laws have been muted/watered down in recognition of the manufacturing base...it may have the effect of making anti-gun states more anti-gun, and pro-gun states more pro-gun....that is not necessarily a good thing.
Even gun makers want to be liked.
Leave it to the New York Times to start an article with an expression of snotty condescencion.
The profits of Machinery Movers should be going up for the next couple of years.
I think they should make the incentives even sweeter by offering contracts on gun purchases from state agencies; and also special state commemorative guns, that are both functional and collectibles.
Imagine how spectacular a $5,000-$10,000 collectible rifle could be. Encourage the company to do R&D with exotic alloys, high tech ceramics stronger than steel, advanced ultra-hard carbon like graphene. They might come up with a whole new class of gun.
Sometimes they really have MUST READ articles, e.g. guest OpEds, science stories, etc., but they only allow free access to 10 articles per month.