Clinton was a serial rapist, or at least a serial sexual harasser. He used the power of his offices (Governor and President) to procure women. Some, like Monica Lewinski, were willing to trade sex for possible favours. Others were coerced. Feminists, who previously (and since) hunted down and destroyed any male, who used “power differential” to get their way with women. Then, they gave a pass to the most powerful male in the world. The hypocrisy is thicker than that blob of asphalt that drips every so many decades.
Spitzer paid for sex, with his own money. While much of the sex industry involves exploitation of women — even to the extent of “white slavery” — the high-priced “escorts” favoured by Spitzer chose to enter the “oldest profession”. Spitzer’s biggest sin was violation of his marriage vows. He was also hyprocritical, as he actively prosecuted prostitution cases, while being in the market for those services himself.
Weiner, like Clinton, used whatever political power he had to procure sexual favours. Unlike Clinton, there does not seem to have been an element of coercion. However, there most definitely was the stench of corruption. Weiner promised his latest target an apartment. If he were Mayor of NYC, it’s reasonable to assume that he would have been offering jobs, contracts, etc. in return for sexual favours. Crass political corruption, in other words. It’s also worth mentioning that Weiner’s transgressions were the most classless of the three — with a big “ick factor”.
In order of worst to least bad (none are good): Clinton, Weiner, Spitzer.