I’ll take one more shot. I’m a glutton for punishment.
You are in charge. What would you do with homosexuals?
I gather you would forbid them from serving their country in the military.
Do you put them to death?
Do you allow them to exist as long as they drink from the homosexual water fountains?
Can they sit in the back of the bus?
Can they sit and eat at a table in restaurants with heterosexuals?
Do you let them go to the same public schools, colleges as heterosexuals?
How would you legislate to keep them in subservient and non-obtrusive so they don’t upset your ideal society?
I keep saying again and again that many things that people are opposed to the promoting the homosexual agenda, such as gaining protected status as a minority have occurred as the result of a huge overreaching government who has assumed the role that it can tell people how to think, what is OK to say. Without the over reaching government, we would have the right to free association. Superior rights aren’t granted to persons based on their sexual orientation with a government that sticks to it’s constitutionally limited role.
Without over reaching government, individuals would choose the teachers, the curriculum they wish their child to experience.
Promoting the homosexual lifestyle is detrimental to the survival of Western civilization. Western civilization is already at risk of disappearing from being buried under the masses of Muslims who are out breeding Western cultures by a huge margin. When Christians become a minority because they are vastly out numbered, remember you supported government legislating morality. How would that shoe fit then? You may not have to wear it in your life, but your children or grandchildren might need to.
So I don’t promote the homosexual agenda, but I don’t consider them sub-human either. They have a right to exist. They have a right to serve in the military. They should have equal rights as US citizens to civil unions providing the same legal benefits of marriage. I don’t like the perversion of the word marriage, because it already has a meaning and definition.
Don’t like them getting survivor benefits? Get rid of survivor benefits unless you can find where in the constitution the federal government is authorized to pay survivor benefits.
They don’t have a right to use government force to teach acceptance of their lifestyle with government policies. Nor do they have a right to use public schools to promote their lifestyle. That is all removed if you have a federal government that hasn’t vastly overstepped it’s authority.
Of course I would keep them out of the military, jeez do you think this is DU or wherever the left goes to promote their ideology?
You forget the rainbow sash they would need to wear to distinguish from the ‘others’.
Word of warning for those with lisps, gay or not, the Conservatives are coming! /s