Did I? No, now kindly stop making things up. What I have said is that what consenting adults do behind closed doors shouldn't matter. I have not once said that I "support" anything. There is a wide difference there.
I've never commented on gays and immigration so we can take that as a strike and a lie right there.
I've never advocated for gay marriage, so we can take that as a second strike and a lie right there. I have commented that I think the Government should get out of the marriage business, but that is not advocacy for gay marriage. Its a comment that Government should not be involved. Twisting that into sign-waving support -- that's a real stretch and one would have to lie in order to call it that.
One more and you're out.
Just because I do not see where there is a compelling reason for Government to get involved in something and I step aside and do NOT call for regulation does not mean I support something. To call it that is a lie.
The world is not entirely black and white. Might be good to keep that in mind some times.
So that is done, I notice in your posting history that you also want to get rid of some of this pro-life stuff.
What I have said is that to win elections, it would be a good idea to tone down the rhetoric. If turning it up won elections, we would be seeing Senator Todd Akin right now.
Didn't work out that way, did it? So, we can write that off to a third strike and lie -- and you're out.
So, now we've established that either there are problems with reading comprehension, or someone wants to throw out bald-faced lies. Let's not speculate as to which; they both lead to the same place.
Good day.
I didn’t make up anything, read your post 151 again and what it was in response to, and I also didn’t make up your years old posting history.
Thanks for not trying to deny that you do push to get conservatives to lighten up on the pro-life agenda.
By the way,Akin lost, but so did pro-abortion Romney.