Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
Once again, you people rely on the weakest possible standard of "citizen", and then you deliberately conflate "citizen" with "natural citizen".

You're either a complete jackass, or simply a liar.

I don't "rely" on anything. I look at history and law to see how people defined terms used in our Constitution and our law. Which, incidentally, was what I thought the discussion was about.

And I have NEVER, EVER failed to distinguish the meanings of "citizen" and "natural born citizen."

Neither has anybody else.

503 posted on 08/02/2013 10:49:11 AM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Winston
And I have NEVER, EVER failed to distinguish the meanings of "citizen" and "natural born citizen."

Oh yeah? So which one did Wong Kim Ark decide?

505 posted on 08/02/2013 10:58:12 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Winston
And I have NEVER, EVER failed to distinguish the meanings of "citizen" and "natural born citizen."

Equating the 1790 Naturalization Act's "natural born citizen" with the 1795 Naturalization Act's "citizen", is a failure to distinguish the meanings.

541 posted on 08/03/2013 11:27:26 AM PDT by Ray76 (Common sense immigration reform: Enforce Existing Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson