No, you aren't getting to claim THAT dodge. You don't respect Article II, you WORSHIP the legal process. Every thing you say has one underlying message. You Agree with anything a court says no matter who stupid or ridiculous it is.
And now you are trying to deflect the point with that fig leaf of claiming "respect" for the constitution?
You don't give a rat's ass what it says, else you would be tearing apart the courts who have been so badly abusing it, rather than attempting to bolster them by endlessly citing whatever crap is vomited out of their mouths.
Once more I note that it is a STRANGE sort of Conservative who lauds courts rather than bashing them. Most of us regard them as petty tyrants that are only interested in forcing their personal ideology on the rest of us.
I post the key findings from Obama eligibility related court rulings, verbatim with links to the entire decision so that anyone who might be interested in a particular Trier of Fact’s rationale can read it in full context.
It is not me who has filed more than 200 lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility. It’s not me who has filed more than 90 appeals in state and federal courts and it’s not me who has submitted 25 petitions for Writs of Certiorari and applications for stays, injunctions and extraordinary writs at the Supreme Court of the United States. It is eligibility challengers who have almost exclusively utilized the courts as the place to conduct this fight.
I post how those courts have ruled, others can decide what those rulings mean.
Intelligent people are capable of learning from each defeat how to correct deficiencies in filings and how to present issues in ways that might receive a more favorable hearing.