Sorry, that should've been:
The case does not mention "natural born citizen" or "natural born citizenship" even ONE time.
And it doesn't. You can't show me even one instance of those terms in that case, or any comment that has the slightest thing to do with Presidential eligibility.
Because it's not there.
Well, Obviously John Marshall must have been referring to some OTHER class of citizenship. What class would that be Jeff? What sort of citizenship was it to which John Marshall was referring Jeff? Tell us Jeff. Inquiring minds want to know!
.
Oh, and here's your words again.
Jeff quoting John Marshall:
"Vattel, who, though not very full to this point, is more explicit and more satisfactory on it than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, says"
"The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens."
Jeff:"Because claiming that a passage defines "natural born citizenship" when it clearly and obviously does not, IS deceit."
Well, Deceit is clearly evident alright.