Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus
So, he contradicted himself? Silly to use that as your example. Wacky.

And, all you have written depends upon the US being able to tell the world people born on their soil aren't their citizens, not if they have some American DNA?

Like I said, according to you and your clan, when it comes to babies, we are the all powerful US of A and all your base are belong to us.

That's not natural born, that's bureaucratic and by treaty BS.

Natural born, by definition, needs no bureaucrat or treaty to make us agree about a person's citizenship or claim to a nation or the nation's claim on them.

It's Obvious! It's simple! It's easy to understand, as opposed to the convoluted mess your clan keeps pushing on US.

Here's a quote for you to research:

"What a tangled web we weave..."

419 posted on 07/30/2013 8:44:18 AM PDT by GBA (Our obamanation: Romans 1:18-32)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies ]


To: GBA

The law of the land covers who is and who isn’t a natural born citizen/citizen of the United States at birth:
“The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: “ http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401

Any court of law looking at this issue will go first with the definitions provided in the current U.S. Code of Laws.


420 posted on 07/30/2013 10:01:49 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson