Replies

You dodged because that's what you seem to do, rather than think your way through something. Others have called you on it, now, so have I. I might as well be blunt. The rest of your post to me is a lie, which is why I reminded you that there really isn't much time for that sort of thing.

Your quoting ability, selectively editing such as you do, has been well demonstrated and, if this truly is how you want to go out of this world, you might do well to send your resume to NBC.

No, YOU dodged, as soon as I pointed out the truth in 349.

You tried to blow as much smoke as possible in post 377.

You tried to blow as much smoke as possible by coming up with some stupid THEORY.

"Citizenship is, blah, blah, blah. And blah, blah, blah."

You don't determine what happened in history by coming up with some THEORY. "Well, I think the Founding Fathers WOULD HAVE required only the highest form of citizenship. Blah, blah, blah. I also think they would've DEFINITELY wanted everyone in America to have health care. Oh, and they wouldn't have wanted anyone to go hungry. So they were DEFINITELY on board for food stamps for all."

You can pull some stupid THEORY out of your backside and say the Founding Fathers were in favor of WHATEVER THE HELL YOU WANT.

THAT'S NOT HOW ANYONE WITH THE SLIGHTEST AMOUNT OF HISTORICAL COMPETENCE DEALS WITH HISTORY.

Only QUACKS deal with history in that manner.

If you want to know what the Founding Fathers intended, YOU GO AND READ THEIR WORDS TO FIND OUT WHAT THEY INTENDED.

And you don't make up your mind beforehand.

And if they weren't explicit enough, you consult the early legal experts of our Republic. In fact, what you REALLY do is find out what the Founding Fathers said, and also find out what our early legal experts said.

And in THIS case (see post 405) ALL OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS, AND ALL OF OUR EARLY LEGAL EXPERTS, WERE IN COMPLETE AGREEMENT.

And they ALL agree that birthers are full of shit.