Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
Nonsense!
Cruz is a Natural Born Citizen.
Cruz was NOT “Naturalized” and Cruz was a Citizen from the moment of his birth.
You are spouting tin foil hat nonsense with no valid legal authority on your side.
39 posted on 07/28/2013 7:13:07 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Kansas58

How is someone born in Canada, with one parent in Cuba, a natural born citizen? Unless that isn’t true, I don’t see how you can claim otherwise.


42 posted on 07/28/2013 7:17:24 PM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Kansas58; Greetings_Puny_Humans
Nonsense! Cruz is a Natural Born Citizen. Cruz was NOT “Naturalized” and Cruz was a Citizen from the moment of his birth. You are spouting tin foil hat nonsense with no valid legal authority on your side.

I'll second what Kansas58 said.

"It is not necessary that a man should be born in this country, to be 'a natural born citizen.' It is only requisite that he should be a citizen by birth, and that is the case with all the children of citizens who have ever resided in this country, though born in a foreign country."

- James Bayard, A Brief Exposition of the Constitution of the United States (1834)

Bayard's exposition, including his comments on Presidnetial eligibility, were approved by "The Great Chief Justice" of the US Supreme Court John Marshall, by legendary Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story, and by the almost-as-famous Chancellor James Kent - no less than three of our greatest early legal experts.

These men knew the Founding Generation, and they knew what they meant when they wrote "natural born citizen."

Cruz is eligible.

66 posted on 07/28/2013 8:10:08 PM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Kansas58
You are spouting tin foil hat nonsense with no valid legal authority on your side.

Again, you simply cannot comprehend the fallacy of your argument. I find it hard to believe that anyone could be so simple minded as to keep asserting this STUPID claim.

The "Legal" authorities gave us Roe v Wade, Kelo v New London, Plessy v Ferguson, Wickard v. Filburn, Dred Scott v Sanford, and a whole host of vile, wicked and WRONG decisions, yet here you are saying we should RESPECT the opinions of all these "Legal authorities."

Once again, I regard you are one of the silliest people I've ever encountered on Free Republic.

235 posted on 07/29/2013 12:09:22 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson