Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kansas58

Retroactive? What are you talking about?


179 posted on 07/29/2013 8:20:24 AM PDT by Ray76 (Common sense immigration reform: Enforce Existing Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76
Congress can not pass a law granting retroactive citizenship to someone, and get around the “Natural Born Citizen” requirement.
The reason it says “Natural Born Citizen” is to prevent retroactive acts of Congress from granting “Birthright” Citizenship and to exclude formally Naturalized Citizens from being “retroactive” citizens from the moment of birth, by act of Congress.
The purpose of the language is very clear.
You birthers harp on “intent” all the time when you have no clue what their real intent was!
I have just given you the INTENT of the Framers.
184 posted on 07/29/2013 8:29:02 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76

He doesn’t know. That’s what makes it so funny!


354 posted on 07/29/2013 4:10:56 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson