Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

That is incorrect. Title 8 section 1401 subsection G of the US code states that he is a US citizen at birth and is thus, a natural born citizen.


108 posted on 07/28/2013 9:31:37 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: taxcontrol

“Title 8 section 1401 subsection G of the US code states that he is a US citizen at birth and is thus, a natural born citizen.”

Any other words you want to insert into the law?

If Congress intended “natural born citizen” the law would state so, just as the law did in 1790. The fact is the law says “citizen”.


155 posted on 07/29/2013 7:34:55 AM PDT by Ray76 (Common sense immigration reform: Enforce Existing Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol
Title 8 section 1401 subsection G of the US code states that he is a US citizen at birth and is thus, a natural born citizen.

Once again, the naturalization article says he's a "natural born citizen"? Are you familiar with the term "non sequitur"?

I don't have a statute that makes me a citizen. Neither does anyone else who is a "natural" citizen. We don't need a "naturalization" statute to make us citizens, we are citizens by the laws of nature.

277 posted on 07/29/2013 1:55:20 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson