Liz won’t win.
Simply not worth supporting someone with a screw loose.
>> Unlike Enzi, the 46-year-old daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney supports the right for states to legalize gay marriage.
Then she’s dead to me. Glad to find out sooner than later.
Ms. Cheny is absolutely wrong on this issue.
There is no such things as gay marriage. There are perverts who like to pretend they are married but marriage is between a man and a woman.
Cheney also opposes a constitutional amendment to stop homosexual marriage, so it isn’t about states.
Cheney also has promoted for years federal homosexualizing of the military and State dept.
While Cheney was promoting the homosexual agenda for these many years, and earning a reputation as out spoken, blunt, courageous, she never uttered anything pro-life until a week or so ago.
The free pass she’s been getting on this issue is nothing short of amazing. There are still conservatives who don’t know where she stands. How is that possible? She and her father think that every state should enact gay marriage. Limbaugh? Levin? They sure don’t want to talk about it. Rush even modified one of his stock statements for Liz. He said “Racist, sexist, bigot” when talking with her about how the media portrays conservatives. Notice what he left off?
She grew up in Virginia, went to college in Colorado and Illinois, then has lived in DC establishment world ever since.
Love these political families. Presto* she’s suddenly the perfect hack to represent Wyoming.
The TEA Party needs a candidate to run against her.
LLS
If she hasn’t said anything about amnesty, which is the most important issue, bar none, facing the GOP, that’s a pretty good indication that she’s pro-amnesty.
Is Liz the daughter who is a lesbian or is it her sister?
I will never support anyone who’s in the tank for sodomite marriage or amnesty......which means the pool is shrinking quickly.
Liz would not have my vote. Too much a Rino, too liberal.
How many GOP senators do you think would vote against homosexual “marriage” if they were the 51st vote?
Not more than ten, I would say.
Beware of the pro-gay media sidestepping the following points concerning Liz Cheney’s support for gay marriage. Not only did pro-gay activist justices sidestep one of the basic reasons for recently finding DOMA unconstitutional, that the states have never delegated to Congress the specific power to regulate marriage, the 10th Amendment clarifying that the Constitution’s silence about such issues means that marriage is a unique state power issue, but also consider this.
DOMA was arguably a violation of the Constitution’s prohibition on religious tests for federal public servants, Clause 3 of Article VI, DOMA associated with the Christian faith.
Again, who cares about federal lawmaker’s stances on gay marriage since the states have never delegated to the feds, via the Constitution, the specific power to address marriage issues.
I’m with Enzi. Internet taxes aren’t nearly as bad as amnesty and the homo agenda, both of which Liz supports. Enzi gets an A+ from NumbersUSA, which is enough for me.
This is the same things as Caroline Kennedy presuming to become Senator from New York based solely on the experience of her relatives.
It bears repeating because some people refuse to listen. God invented marriage, not man. God designated marriage, not as a contractual agreement, but as a covenant. Governments may be able to regulate contracts, but a covenant is based on the laws of God and not man. Thus marriage is an institution outside of the bounds of government.
Government was happy to intrude into the marriage because when we gave tax exemptions based on marital status, or when we taxed a person’s estate upon their death, or when the State stepped in to direct the disposition of an estate, or when we used the State to enforce marital fidelity or grant divorces, we had to allow the State to define who was “married” and who was not.
As with all things Statist, the secular State’s definition of marriage and divorce has come to have more weight in society than God’s definition.
God defines marriage as being between men and women. While many men whom God called righteous in the Bible practiced polygamy, Jesus is quoted in Matthew chapter 19 that from the beginning of humanity, it was God’s intent that marriage would only be one man and one woman. In Mark chapter 10, Jesus stated that God, not man, joins the husband and wife and the two are “one flesh”, an act that by its very nature is only heterosexual.
God defines sexual relations between people of the same sex as against His law, that is immoral. In Revelation 22:15, a book dictated to John by Jesus, God tells us that anyone who practices sexual immorality will not be granted eternal life.
These are ecclesiastical considerations that are outside of secular government, that is unless we want government to police sexual behavior between consenting adults based on the standards of the Bible, assuming we can agree what those are. Do we want Congress to have that debate?
Maybe it is time to get government out of the marriage business and to return it to the private sphere. The problem for me today is that people who want to call themselves “married” against God’s law (as I read it) are willing to use the State to force me to recognize that marriage, which I cannot do. The want to have the State’s public education system indoctrinate my children that homosexual marriage is “normal”. They want to force me to subsidize the homosexual marriage in the tax code just like the godly marriage is subsidized, and they will use state agencies to punish me for “discrimination” if I decline to accept their status in any way.
If the State must force me to acknowledge its power to declare two men to be “married”, then I must support efforts to remove that power from the State. If people who don’t want God defining their personal morality demand a separation of church and State then let us also have separation of marriage and State as well. If those people don’t want any displays of the Ten Commandments in government buildings, they cannot hide behind the Commandments that protect marriage when it comes marriage that God cannot sanction.
Could it be all this “gay” rights stuff is to get everyone used to the idea then Hillary can come out and marry Huma?
Liz Cheney, another RINO in waiting.