Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Errant
No Comment... I'd be banned for life if I said what I'm thinking about our so-called "representatives" in "FREAKING" Washington DC who are letting this CRAP happen...
If the government is able to determine a person's password, which is typically stored in encrypted form, the credential could be used to log in to an account to peruse confidential correspondence or even impersonate the user.

No no no!
This is the dummest thing the new American Reign of Terror Flying Monkeys can adopt.

After the criminal shenanigans of the State Dept, the CIA, IRS, Health and Human service and the State Department have pulled, any evidence that those flying Monkeys try to present in court, as a result of this abuse, won't be worth a bucketful of spit!

Bring
it
on!!

"Your Honor, this criminal internet post by the accused was NOT falsified by us; Trust us, your Honor!"

*snicker*

130 posted on 07/25/2013 7:33:03 PM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: publius911
After the criminal shenanigans of the State Dept, the CIA, IRS, Health and Human service and the State Department have pulled, any evidence that those flying Monkeys try to present in court, as a result of this abuse, won't be worth a bucketful of spit!

Very true.

I would think careful federals would actually prefer not to learn the target's password, lest they be seen to have contaminated the chain of custody.

If the prosecution produces damning evidence gleaned from a provider's servers, a possible defense is to claim the defendant didn't put it there, that someone else logged into the account and added the incriminating stuff. The last thing they need is for the defense to claim that someone was a G-man!

135 posted on 07/25/2013 7:58:04 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

To: publius911

I’m just waiting for the first case where, due to these revelations, the jury acquits someone because of the “reasonable doubt” cast upon any Internet-based or digital evidence (and most evidence is going to be digital, with paper accounting files, and so on in decline). All it will take is one astute jury and one convincing defense attorney.

After that, it will be back to square one, with shoe leather and interviews for the coppers...


154 posted on 07/25/2013 9:24:35 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson