Nice of you to rewrite reality a bit. BTW aren't you late for a "Justice for Treyvon demonstration?"
Huh? Honestly, if you have a response, fine. Instead ít appears you have no substantive response available. However, if you want to make a real argument that I misunderstood the data presented, go ahead, make that argument. I make no claim of infallibility. I gathered the nature of Dart’s contact from his wife’s description, and that is exactly how I understood his contact, like I myself have done, reaching out to an angry individual by touching their shoulder or upper arm. It’s a basic, almost reflexive form of communication. If you have information that picks up something different about it, I missed it. I am sure the jury in any trial of Mr Crocker will have access to better information and will thoroughly explore the possibilities.