Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Repeat Offender

Anyone in this city with damage to life or property should sue this city government for failure of duty to protect its citizens.
For the umpteenth millionth time: The police are under NO, nada, zip, zilch, zero, duty to protect citizens; not even when they’re in uniform, not even when they’re on duty. SCOTUS has routinely upheld this and ruled AGAINST the plaintiffs.

The duty and responsibility of protection relies in the individual citizen, not the police.

**
You’re right. I stand corrected.


224 posted on 07/15/2013 9:24:47 PM PDT by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]


To: LibsRJerks
Upon re-reading this, I came across a bit short - ie "for the umpteenth millionth time."

I have posted about this several times in the past. Didn't mean to come off as a jerk.

579 posted on 07/16/2013 1:59:26 PM PDT by Repeat Offender (What good are conservative principles if we don't stand by them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson