I read on another post here on FR over a week ago that any black person has at least four male relatives with criminal convictions in their past.
Loosening concealed carry weapon requirements and ‘stand your ground’ laws would have a detrimental effect on extended black families, as young men would end up dead.
It appears to me that Progressives are trying to do to the U.S. what Progressives did in England: disarm the law abiding citizenry so others do not get killed.
This is tampering with our sacred right to self-defense.
Nothing is sacred to the liberal mind except slaughtering the alive unborn ... and they get that little ritual in the black communities way too much for black people to still be blind to the democrips’ evil exploitation of them.
Compare the number of Chicago homicides compared to casualties of operation enduring freedom (Afghanistan).
Chicago OEF
2001 667 12
2002 656 49
2003 601 48
2004 453 52
2005 451 99
2006 471 98
2007 448 117
2008 513 155
2009 459 317
2010 436 499
2011 435 418
2012 503 310
2013 195 75
If the Sharpton’s and Shabazz’s were concerned about black homicide, why not look at the problems in Chicago? When it’s statistically more dangerous to walk the streets of Chicago than to serve in a combat zone, I think it might be a problem. Instead they latch on to a death that’s not black on black and fan the flames. The Zimmerman trial is all about creating racial tensions from our street agitator in Chief. It’s all he knows how to do. It’s theater designed to fill the news with a story that diverts attention from the real problems, like employment, healthcare, etc. It is truly disgusting and I am willing to bet that Holder will pursue a civil right case for the express purpose of keeping this in the news. They are desperate and have no moral grounding.
Here is the article:
Values, the O.J. Verdict, and Right-To-Carry, or A Statistician Explains a Conundrum (Zimmerman)
http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2013/07/a-statistician-explains-conundrum-by.html