It does if Zimmerman said he did but he didn’t. I just want to know the truth.
Whether treyvon had his hand over Z's mouth is completely irrelevant. If you want to konw if that really happened, you can ask after the trial, because the State only used that example to try to protray him as a liar. Not having all kinds of blood on Treyvons hands doesn't mean it didn't happen or that it was not compromised from the mishandling of his hands (evidence). Do you believe his head was banged on a sidewalk? If yes, nothing else matters in this case. IMHO