It isn’t my job to explain anything. I just asked a question. Zimmerman’s fate is now in the hands of the jury. My opinion doesn’t mean a thing.
The moral of the story is: don’t assault people.
An armed society is a polite society.
Fair enough. I'm simply stating that in this case the supposedly higly accurate and infallible “forensic evidence” is full of “inconclusive results”, spoiled samples and inept evidence preservation that makes the whole of their testimony suspect. IMHO.