Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip
Funny how the state never showed that “piece of the awning”

Well... it didn't seem related at the time, according to Serino, so it wasn't taken into evidence, or if taken, wasn't marked as evidence. They found it later, not the night of the incident, so it would be darn near impossible to prove it was 'there' that night.

740 posted on 07/13/2013 10:52:10 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
They found it later, not the night of the incident, so it would be darn near impossible to prove it was 'there' that night.

They didn't have to. All they had to do was find Martin's fingerprints on it and perhaps his shoeprints behind the bushes.

However they released the body without processing it properly and getting the fingerprints that could trace that back to him and as we came to find out they lost his shoes as well. Coincidence???

776 posted on 07/13/2013 11:04:22 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 740 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson