I am a little surprised that the judge re-wrote the question on paper so the jurors could read it over and over again but then counsel let her read it back to them but didn’t ask to see it. I’m sorry, but I wouldn’t have trusted her. I’d have asked to see it first if I were the lawyer on either side.
Actually I think MoM DID ask..but its about 1,000 posts ago and I’m unable to direct you there.. feeling kinda cursive.
I am a little surprised that the judge re-wrote the question on paper so the jurors could read it over and over again but then counsel let her read it back to them but didn’t ask to see it. I’m sorry, but I wouldn’t have trusted her. I’d have asked to see it first if I were the lawyer on either side.
She did quickly state they could see it , but we have no verification they saw it.
In any case its been a long time for them to come back with their specifics.
There’s careful, then there’s paranoid, and I’m usually on the right side of that equation. Because the note becomes part of the record, and because making that kind of a misrepresentation would get her thrown off the bench, and the case thrown out, I’d trust her on this one. Not that I didn’t work through the possibilities, though.