talking heads saying they are thinking if just pulling a trigger in isolation is enough by itself for element of “intent”.
If GZ intended to kill TM he would have shot him TWICE.
well then that shows them for what they are.... under that reasoning all shootings would be manslaughter and none ever justifiable
.
One juror might be wanting that, we can’t tell. But in that, pulling the trigger was his self defense. Also we have to remember the state has burden of proof to prove it wasn’t. They don’t have that, at all. The presumption of innocence is with Z. So that approach has to ignore everything else, if that’s what at least one of them is doing.