I’m just hoping that some of them don’t start having PMS symptoms when they have differences in opinions, they may have to call in the bailiff to break up a fist fight.
900 posts on this zimmerman trial
only 8 on this more important amnesty thread
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3042512/posts
the news media has everyone even on here focused on what they the media want. pure control. i have made myself not care about the zimmerman trial because i hate the media as they are democrats
To: Uncle Chip
I’m just hoping that some of them don’t start having PMS symptoms when they have differences in opinions, they may have to call in the bailiff to break up a fist fight.
There is no emergency that they will face in their deliberations that a good shrimp cocktail take care of.
With all the ladies on this thread, I think we may be getting into a dicey area. lol
“I’m just hoping that some of them don’t start having PMS symptoms when they have differences in opinions, they may have to call in the bailiff to break up a fist fight.”
Yes, disgusting post. I suppose if the jury was men, they would have enlarged prostates and have to run to the bathroom over and over and also they might have “jock itch”.
Do you really want to keep this up?
OK, I just wanted to throw something out there that’s really been bothering me:
George Zimmerman was charged, and is on trial for 2nd degree murder, correct? Then how can any judge just arbitrarily toss in another charge (manslaughter), one that the defendant was not originally with???
Is this not automatically grounds for an appeal? The defense’s case was entirely based on the 2nd degree murder charge.
Judge: “Ladies of the jury: If you can’t find the defendant guilty of the crime he was charged with, then, try manslaughter. Or rape. Or, oh , I dunno, child molestation. Or, well, you decide - anything with a long sentence will do.”
Do the jurors get pee pee breaks? All at once, or staggered to avoid lines and delays since they’re all one sex?
Bruce at WFTV:
We’ve been told lawyers are heading to the courthouse.
Life via WFTV.COM streaming.
Something is going on in the courtroom.
jury apparently is asking a question
WFTV commentator news guy: This is the most important case going on in the world.
[sigh]
question apparently has something to do with manslaughter
Jury needs clarification on question regarding manslaughter.
[2nd degree apparently no longer under consideration]
Manslaughter could be 10-30 years with no early parole.
I’m of the view that Zimmerman will be convicted of manslaughter - unjustly, because he was acting in self-defense. That doesn’t change my view of self-defense. See my tagline.
Judge is smiling.
[She is apparently getting what ‘she’ wanted — a conviction on some charge.]
Just saw this on Facebook.......”The Five on Fox (Fans)
BREAKING NOW: Media has been asked back to courtroom. We DONT know why. ~~Seano”
Gee, if Zimmerman had been a cop, this would’ve been ruled justifiable homicide long, long, long ago. Peons need to understand their lives are worthless in the eyes of the state.
If 1 juror feels it was “reasonable” for GZ to fear for his life, then they must aquit. Can it be that the concealed carry Jurist would not feel it was reasonable to fear for safety? Why else carry?
Fox News identifies Jennifer Bonjean as a criminal defends attorney, but her website makes it clear that she is a civil rights attorney - meaning she’s one more leftist propagandist.
It’s possible that the jury is just methodically going through the charges, like, you know, they’re supposed to. Anything is possible.