IMO, it is rare cases when one can tell what a jury is going to do. We have the advantage of knowing things which they are not supposed to know. We do not know their internal biases. We don’t know how they will interact...who is dominate who is a follower. What we do know is their is one dead person and one whose entire future existance lays in the balance. Frankly I actually believe the tradmark mom probably believes St Trayvon was a good lad...who has not heard that argument from a mother confronted by soneone complaining about their kids (my boy would never do that for example).
From my perspective, GZ is getting the dirty end of the stick with this show trial but that no way influences what the jury will decide. Obviously the judge wants him convicted, she has to live with that. The whole fiasco began with the state taking the case away from Sanford and assigning a “pro enforcement anti gun and SYG law” attorney. That began the dominos and we are all held captive to that decision. Even if GZ is found NG, there is no justice here.
Well stated and thank you for your service...
“Frankly I actually believe the tradmark mom probably believes St Trayvon was a good lad”
She barely knew him. She didn’t raise him after the age of 3.
She’s in it for the money she can make off his death. The race baiters put every bit of this in her head. The “mother” that should have been called was the stepmother that raised him. 10 to one says she was not called because she told the cops she could not recognize his voice. So like I said the women you saw glaring at everyone in the court room didn’t know him. She knew she gave birth to him but as far as being the one that raised him, absolutely not. Sure with MoM had brought this up and also had called the stepmother to the stand.