Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeaHawkFan

“According to the U.S. Supreme Court in Garner v. Tennessee, 471 U.S. 1 (1985), a private citizen has broader authority to use deadly force under the common law than law enforcement officers.”

Thanks - I new that was the case in Washington State, but didn’t realize it was a national thing. And if Washington State one doesn’t need to be in fear for their life or in physical danger to shoot someone.

Although we’ll see how the case in Spokane works out, where the guy is being charged with shooting the car thief. Legal, as he was stopping a felony, and the police did not press charges. But the DA brought him in - similar to this Zimmerman fiasco.


31 posted on 07/11/2013 6:10:26 PM PDT by 21twelve ("We've got the guns, and we got the numbers" adapted and revised from Jim M.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: 21twelve

In the state of Washington, a private citizen can use up to deadly force in an attempt to apprehend a felon. Just make sure you first tell them to stop or you will shoot. You can even shoot if they are attempting to flee after a warning. Just make sure they committed a felony before you shoot.


47 posted on 07/11/2013 6:57:51 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: 21twelve

Here is the State of Washington statute on the use of deadly force. Please note the “Legislative recognition” in the notes section.

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9A.16.040


51 posted on 07/11/2013 7:02:13 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson