I know that the THC was never actually discussed in front of the jury, but - - - Was it entered into evidence? Any chance it could appear in the jury room, as they are poring over evidence? Any chance they could look at the autopsy report, and see the toxicology report included with it?
The most glaring thing is you expect a prosecutor to say “This is exactly what happened, and the evidence proves that to you”. Instead, he is mocking Zimmerman and asking about why TM had no blood on his hands. BUT he never said that’s because GZ beat up TM, or GZ had his gun out and shot from the beginning, or GZ faked his wounds.
It’s just astounding and all because of course they can’t deal with the fact Zimmerman got beat up.
So they have no coherent story of what exactly Zimmerman did.