[P-Marlowe]

I was under the impression that if the persecution argued good character on the part of the dead thug punk, the defense could present evidence to impeach that.

The judge prohibited the defense from bringing in that evidence. Hence the defense can't use it in closing arguments. So BDLR can go on and on on what a sweet innocent little boy Martin was and if MOM says anything to refute that in his closing arguments he could be sanctioned or the judge could declare a mis-trial.

BDLR is just baiting the defense in hopes they make a big mistake tomorrow.

BDLR would like nothing more than having the judge declare a mistrial based on misconduct by the defense.

[sitetest]

Dear P-Marlowe,

I'd been under the impression that the judge had ruled that the defense couldn't bring up evidence about his character unless the prosecution “opened the door” by asserting that the dead thug punk was actually a little angel, that the prohibition on the defense was at least partially contingent.

Thus, mama thug punk and thug punk daddy were careful not to make assertions about dead thug punks sterling character.

sitetest

[txmissy]

OMG - Bernie’s starting to sound psycho.