Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EnquiringMind

That’s what I think, bad news for defense.


1,510 posted on 07/11/2013 11:22:35 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1506 | View Replies ]


To: Toespi

who is juror #5. I looked at their numbers and do not see a #5.
Smirking meaning “yea that’s right” or “yea whatever”


1,553 posted on 07/11/2013 11:28:32 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1510 | View Replies ]

To: Toespi; EnquiringMind

One juror “smirked” at a pros. line and that’s “bad for the defense”??

Define “smirked”.

Do you read minds also?

Just wondering...

And I’m thinking, there SHOULD be an aquittal but if the jury is hung, instead of convicting, that’s better than nothing.

Therefore a single juror smirk - and even “mind reading” them as possibly for conviction - does not a conviction make.

Sorry, I’m just not getting your thought processess...


1,566 posted on 07/11/2013 11:29:46 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear". - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1510 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson