[Jim Robinson]

Your post is simply a lie, retread. Very few FReepers worked against Romney after he was the only one standing against Obama, even though it was obvious from the beginning that Mr. RomneyCare the lifelong big government aborrionist/statist had no chance whatsoever.

[dragonblustar]

Very few FReepers worked against Romney after he was the only one standing against Obama

That's true. I think the desperation to get rid of Obama forced a lot of people to vote for Romney. The Republicans really screwed over it's base. But they've been doing that for a long time.

After the 2008 election, Romney's team worked overtime in attacking Palin. They had to take her out so their golden boy could run.

[Colofornian]

...unlike the anti Romney goons who could not rest from their labors of bashing and trashing the 2012 Presidential nominee. [District13, post #38]

Very few FReepers worked against Romney after he was the only one standing against Obama, even though it was obvious from the beginning that Mr. RomneyCare the lifelong big government aborrionist/statist had no chance whatsoever. [JimRob]

Allow me to flesh out what Jim Rob points out as it applied to my 2012 anti-Romney FR posts:

* Out of respect for JimRob's political stance that he took in mid-August, I did not even post after Aug. 17 until October. I didn't post anything Romney related for over 8 weeks.

* When I returned just over 3 weeks prior to the election, I jumpstarted more anti-Obama threads (2) than Romney-related ones (1). And I didn't post any new Romney threads those 20 days leading up to the election.

* And as of when Gingrich dropped out, for 3 months up until mid-August, I averaged jumpstarting only one Romney related thread per week. [Surely, the Romney world could withstand a Baker's dozen - or so -- of these kind of pure political discourse threads]

And if a few others posted Romney related threads during that time, hey, it IS a Free Republic, after all! [Not everybody bends the knee to Salt Lake City HQ]