Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosiermama

>> Alter she cools down and thinks about it prosecution lied to her too.

She may just now be seeing that, but it’s not for lack of trying by the defense to make her aware of it.

She did nothing to force proper discovery by the prosecution MONTHS ago... nor would she delay the trial so the defense could work with the late evidence forced on them.

An appeals court should be quite interested in these issues. But I hope it doesn’t come to that, and I’m confident it will not.


2,504 posted on 07/09/2013 7:22:28 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2468 | View Replies ]


To: Nervous Tick

the court of public opinion will find this texts etc relevant...even if the judge doesn’t

if they cant authenticate the texts etc how can they do it to use against a defendant? must be some precedents...


2,510 posted on 07/09/2013 7:24:43 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2504 | View Replies ]

To: Nervous Tick

I know one thing for sure. She is rushing the defense intentionally and this “I have a jury back there waiting” crap is ridiculous. She is more worried about “her jury” than the dependent getting a fair trial which is why there is a jury sitting back there in the first place.


2,522 posted on 07/09/2013 7:28:50 PM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2504 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson