apparently common sense is ruled out
the prosecution could have brought in their own animation
... but that does not go back to the jury room
... that they can play over and over and over again
judge
gives a certain weight that this court does not necessarily
feel comports with the weight of the evidence blah blah
Pierce is the only Florida case
GM versus someone is a civil case
Pierce:
demonstrative exhibit
when they are clear they should be accepted and when they are confusing they should be rejected
prosecution
animation not based on any underlying physical data
who is mr connor?