I don’t understand what the prosecution is claiming happened. It looks like they are trying for reasonable doubt. It’s almost like they are saying, “well maybe Zimmerman did something wrong that night”.
1,438 posted on
07/09/2013 12:27:40 PM PDT by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: Pollster1
I don’t understand what the prosecution is claiming happened. I thought when Bernie introduced the trees, maybe their case would come into focus. It did not, at least for me.
1,454 posted on
07/09/2013 12:32:29 PM PDT by
don-o
(He will not share His glory, and He will not be mocked! Blessed be the Name of the Lord forever!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson