Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: don-o

Yes, people who love animals are not keen on animals used for studies.

I really wonder how that bit of info impacted the animal lovers on the jury. I would like to believe it did nothing to impede the important parts of the doctor’s testimony.


1,267 posted on 07/09/2013 11:54:32 AM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44 ('Hey citizen, what's in YOUR closet?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1256 | View Replies ]


To: AllAmericanGirl44
Yes, people who love animals are not keen on animals used for studies.

It is possible to have love for animals w.o becoming unbalanced about how they Creator expects and allows us to deal with them.

Saving human life, even extracting justice is a worthy goal that justifies the taking of an animals life.

1,279 posted on 07/09/2013 11:57:40 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory, and He will not be mocked! Blessed be the Name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1267 | View Replies ]

To: AllAmericanGirl44
Then by that logic, a defendant who, say, worked in a slaughterhouse would automatically be found guilty by a militant vegetarian juror?
1,346 posted on 07/09/2013 12:07:52 PM PDT by JPG (Obama Does Egypt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1267 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson